<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Medical Negligence Solicitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk</link>
	<description>UK Solicitors specialising in Medical Negligence Claims nationwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Medical negligence removed from the scope of legal aid</title>
		<link>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/medical-negligence-removed-from-the-scope-of-legal-aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/medical-negligence-removed-from-the-scope-of-legal-aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical negligence compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No win no fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following many months of Parliamentary scrutiny and media coverage, yesterday finally saw the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act 2012 receiving Royal assent. This means that the new act will become effective from April 1, 2013. The &#8230; <a href="http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/medical-negligence-removed-from-the-scope-of-legal-aid/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/medical-negligence-removed-from-the-scope-of-legal-aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extent of GP prescription errors revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/gp-prescription-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/gp-prescription-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GP errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical negligence compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking News today includes the shocking research, which was commissioned by the General Medical Council (often known as GMC) of the huge number of errors aid by when writing prescriptions. In a survey of 1,777 GP patients, an amazing 5% &#8230; <a href="http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/gp-prescription-errors/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/gp-prescription-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reappointment to the Law Society Clinical Negligence Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/reappointment-to-the-law-society-clinical-negligence-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/reappointment-to-the-law-society-clinical-negligence-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical negligence compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are really pleased to confirm the reappointment of our medical negligence solicitor, and the head of our medical negligence specialist team, to the Law Society&#8217;s own Clinical Negligence Accreditation Scheme. This particular scheme, according to the Law Society itself, &#8230; <a href="http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/reappointment-to-the-law-society-clinical-negligence-panel/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/reappointment-to-the-law-society-clinical-negligence-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1/3 of Jackson medical negligence proposals are doubtful</title>
		<link>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/13-of-jackson-medical-negligence-proposals-are-doubtful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/13-of-jackson-medical-negligence-proposals-are-doubtful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical negligence compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The planned significant changes to the way that personal injury and medical negligence claims are run and paid for continue to be controversial. The latest news is that Lord Justice Jackson, who was the author of the government’s civil justice &#8230; <a href="http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/13-of-jackson-medical-negligence-proposals-are-doubtful/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themedicalnegligencesolicitor.co.uk/13-of-jackson-medical-negligence-proposals-are-doubtful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

